Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roohi Zuberi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. A valid deletion rationale has not been advanced. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America1000 02:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Roohi Zuberi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should published in the Hindu WP. Some of the references are not written in English BrantleyIzMe (talk) 14:42, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * From WP:NOENG - "Citations to non-English reliable sources are allowed on the English Wikipedia...English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when available". However, that isn't a valid reason to delete the article. Chris857 (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

a translation into English should always accompany the citation/reference BrantleyIzMe (talk) 14:59, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * No legitimate reason for deletion has peen presented so far, such as lack of notability. Edison (talk) 16:02, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep no valid rationale for deletion presented. SportingFlyer  talk  04:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia does not have any requirement that the sources be written in English — as long as (a) our article is written in English, and (b) the sources are reliable ones that support a credible notability claim, it doesn't matter what language the references are or aren't written in. There's this cool thing called Google Translate, y'see, and even if it ain't perfect there are plenty of Wikipedia contributors who are fluent in the Hindi or Urdu languages and can translate the sources for you if you need clarification. So no prejudice against renomination in the future if it can be shown that the sources actually don't support notability or aren't about her, but the language that the sources happen to be in is not a valid deletion rationale in and of itself. Bearcat (talk) 18:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:17, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, waste of time. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Bearcat. 344917661X (talk) 20:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong keep language is not really a matter. D4iNa4 (talk) 11:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, No clear reason for deletion. Language should not be a hook for deleting. AmericanAir88 (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.