Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Room 10 Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 06:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Room 10 Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable record label: no third party references establish notability and used only to self-release material by one act. Fails WP:CORP. I42 (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing notability of companies: no sources, minimal releases for a label. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above, and due to reliance on myspace for sourcing. RadManCF (talk) 20:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep If you actually made the effort to read Wikipedia standards, then you would realise that: WP:QS provided that the company is proven notable by outside sources, you can use the MySpace as a source for background information necessary to  properly discuss the notable aspects of the band. Blaze42 (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Above user has a supposed COI with The Foxes. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails notability, single band label, could be merged with the band's site. Blogs and Myspace references only, not reliable, appears to be a COI. No signifigant coverage. (GregJackP (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.