Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roomorama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 14:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Roomorama

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page has been around for over 3 years, so CSD may not apply here. The page however has gone for almost an entire year without a single source to show notability. At this point, this is just a page that says it's a website that exists. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I have no strong opinion as to whether this is kept, but just to note that when this was written the sources were there and they were removed en-masse (along with most of the body text) by a SPA a few months ago. &#8209; Iridescent 14:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete It is very odd that a SPA with the same name as the web site apparently removed the references, at least some of which were positive. Reverting to that version, however, would re-create a blatant advertisement and it did not appear to be savable.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There does not appear to be significant coverage in independent sources.  Deli nk (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.