Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roomy cheese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Caciocavallo. Tim Song (talk) 02:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Roomy cheese

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication that this cheese is notable, couldn't find many sources on Google.  — fetch ·  comms   21:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to "Romy cheese'. See here and here. I suspect it's a simple spelling mistake. --Haruth (talk) 22:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Zero hits in the archive of newspapers,, one (possibly) in books . Romy cheese gets two hits in the books ,one of which suggests that this is more commonly called Caciocavallo.  I don't think "roomy cheese" is even enough for a redirect. Mandsford 00:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * * Agree. Appears to be Egyptian version of Caciocavallo. The Caciocavallo article actually includes "Roomi Cheese" under the In other languages section! Roomi cheese as redirect? --Haruth (talk) 00:53, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * redirect to Caciocavallo s a plausible misspelling for Roomi cheese. -- Whpq (talk) 19:06, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * In that case Roomi cheese should be made into a redirect as well. Buddy431 (talk) 21:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * One possible spelling will be enough, whatever it is. Otherwise, we would be making redirects for Roomy cheese and Roomi cheese and Rumey cheese and Roomey cheese and Romy cheese.  I imagine that the word has been heard on television and that it sounds like it rhymes with "gloomy" instead of "foamy", in which case people won't think to search under "romy".  I'd rather go with Roomi, since roomy is an adjective that refers to "having a lot of room".  Mandsford 13:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd support a redirect per the above logic.  — fetch ·  comms   01:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect (and perhaps other plausible spellings) to Caciocavallo per above. -- Pink Bull  01:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.