Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roost Shared Storage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Roost Shared Storage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable company per WP:CORPDEPTH- any content could be added to Spacer (self-storage) which later acquired this company (so additionally there will be no more coverage of this company in future) jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a shame as I've found references. How much of the article can be salvaged? UaMaol (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1  (distænt write)  17:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * How much of this article can be salvaged? UaMaol (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * All subjects on Wikipedia must be fundamentally notable to have an article, and this company simply doesn't meet our guidelines. I'm sorry- I know this isn't what you wanted to hear- but if you find this topic interesting, perhaps you might want to host this content on your own blog or website? jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This I am aware of. As you said yourself "any content could be added to Spacer (self-storage)", how much of the article can be added to Spacer? I don't care massively about the company, but I believe in retaining and improving information instead of simply deleting it (unless it's COPYVIO). Merger into a section would be more appropriate I think therefore. UaMaol (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- 10 employees? Too soon, or -- too late, because the company has already been acquired. Way too minor to warrant a stand-alone article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ   00:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.