Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Root of the Tudor Rose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mari Griffith. North America1000 05:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Root of the Tudor Rose

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book. The article relies on self-published source and I couldn't find independent trusted sources beyond a singleWales Online article. Certainly, not enough to establish notability. Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:42, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, found this from Historical Novels Review, that discusses the development of the book, but as it is mainly an author interview, more is needed. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mari Griffith. No RS elaborates on the book, AFAICS.Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88(talk) 22:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC) I don't want this article to be deleted. I'll get a photo as soon as I can find one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baraka powys (talk • contribs) 08:13, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: It can't hurt to relist this once more to get a better feel.
 * Merge as suggested (leaving the usual redirect). We cannot have an article on every book, even on those that do well.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge with Mari Griffith  - agree with User: Peterkingiron. Vorbee (talk) 06:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 *  Merge Fails WP:NBOOK. The author is marginally notable, so a merge is the best way to get a reasonably-sized article.Pontificalibus 06:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.