Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rootdown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Skomorokh  07:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Rootdown

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Band lacking in notability of musical groups. Don't be fooled by the bluelink on Paul Wright- it's a disambiguation. Google News does not turn up any in-depth reliable sources. tedder (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete although I thought this: "charted in the top fifteen of the Air 1 radio chart. ROOTDOWN also has other accomplishments from "Summer of Love" including rising to as high as number 6 on the ITunes top reggae albums chart." might help for notability, a) Air 1 is a local radio station and isn't a national chart as required per WP:BAND, and b) AFAIK iTunes doesn't count as a "national chart" (correct me if I'm wrong). Google searches turn up nothing particularly promising. SMC (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. These are the concerns that led me to tag it for notability earlier. Thank you, tedder and SMC, for looking into the details. ~YellowFives 02:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Air 1 Radio is a NATIONAL radio station aired nationwide and also internationally.  It is a subsidiary of KLOVE. I am not sure what you found was wrong with the blue tag on Paul Wright as he founded the band, was signed on a major label and has been nominated for a Grammy in the past.  spartannumber33 (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2009
 * — spartannumber33 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * This band meets the notability because they have had a single chart on the radio in accordance to: 2) Has had a charted single or album on any national music chart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzvsbulls (talk • contribs) 06:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * — Jazzvsbulls (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 11:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: It's silly to use Google News as a measure of coverage. Tons of people and organizations who deserve Wikipedia entries wouldn't show up on Google News on a particular day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doylesrader (talk • contribs) 23:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay then, if not news searches (for which Google News is the most vast), what do you think we should use as a "measure of coverage" for bands? There's nothing else on offer in the way of reputable third-party sources with which to establish notability and verifiability. SMC (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Weak keep While no single element of WP:BAND is completely met, there are enough that are almost met to warrant keeping. Specifically, things like the articles found by Fences, the inclusion of a (instead of two) notable musician (Paul Wright, whose blue link is NOT just a disambiguation), a national tour, etc. Vulture19 (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - assuming it can be proven, a National tour counts towards WP:BAND - "4. Has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.[note 4]" - and if so, then I would favor a keep. Bearian (talk) 19:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I found some substantial local coverage and one niche review. Not sure if this is enough to meet the WP:GNG. I am unconvinced that the stated charting history meets the requirement in WP:BAND for charting in national charts, which doesn't mean genre or online charts. Fences  &amp;  Windows  20:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per coverage found by Fences.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.