Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RootzWiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

RootzWiki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability beyond number of Twitter followers and acknowledgements of passing references by websites. ViperSnake151  Talk  19:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - no secondary sources to establish article as notable.  CookieMonster755   (talk)   04:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not much significant notability about the company with News simply providing links mostly from their website and Books providing nothing useful. Highbeam and thefreelibrary provided nothing significant as well. SwisterTwister   talk  05:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above not notable lacks third party sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.