Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ropewalk (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Ropewalk (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is unsourced and it fails Notability (films). Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * alts:
 * year:(
 * aka:
 * aka:
 * filmmaker:
 * filmmaker:


 * Delete... for while it was easy enough to address article format, and while a theatrical release is fine, this one does not seem to have made any waves. WP:NF is failed.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as there are no signs of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  23:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.