Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Kaplan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  02:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Rory Kaplan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable musician lacking non-trivial support. red dog six (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find some non-significant sources after a quick google search, but the subject doesn't pass notability per WP:MUSICBIO. Harsh (talk)  07:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  04:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. I just added 9 hyperlinks from other articles and 6 references. Seems like Kaplan has been involved in a number of music projects with well known artists. --Kbabej (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Could you please list two reliable independent sources with substantial coverage here in this discussion? Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * No, but you can search for them or go to the article. --Kbabej (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I did search and go to the article. I don't see any substantial coverage in reliable sources and since you can't or won't provide any I hope the closing admin will take that into account. Not much of an argument if you can't back it up with anything.. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.