Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rory Lewis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Rory Lewis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Resume-like page previously deleted by my prod has been recreated. Lewis is an assistant professor of little note. His 'h'-index is around 8, highest-cited paper (not 1st author) is 28. Abductive (reasoning) 05:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Why is the reflist numbered in reverse order? Is this a cut-and-paste from elsewhere, and is it a copyvio? Andy Dingley (talk) 02:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of passing WP:PROF. —Ruud 03:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Autobiography by the creator's own admission. No MUSIC notability (also by the creator's own admission). I don't see any WP:PROF notability in article or in google scholar, google news, google search, etc. Tradedia (talk) 08:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Is this even real? Inventor, musician, sportsman, warrior... --Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * delete after moving to author's userpage. Fails WP:PROF and is pure autobiography. What's with these kind of articles these days? - UtherSRG (talk) 10:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROF. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 13:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.