Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosa Hwang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 20:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Rosa Hwang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to be notable. There's enough to pass A7, and I've just removed the BLP PROD as it is sourced now, but one is her blog, and the other merely lists her name. Can't find anything more really. Ged UK  12:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  15:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: No WP:RS to judge whether person meets WP:GNG. I also couldn't find anything. Crtew (talk) 08:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No non-WP:PRIMARYSOURCES; even its "external link" is not a page about her but a news article that she wrote about Jarome Iginla, meaning that it demonstrates her existence but fails to provide verification for any of the article's content. For the record, her work has been almost entirely as a news producer rather than as an on-air journalist — which doesn't automatically make her less notable in and of itself, but it does mean that she's not a public figure or a potential subject of media coverage in WP:RS in quite the same way as an on-air journalist would be. Also there's a possibility of WP:COI issues here, as the article's creator has the username User:Cdnjournfdn (i.e. Canadian Journalism Foundation). Bearcat (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I follow the conflict of interest argument here, given that she's not mentioned on the Canadian Journalism Project as being associated with it. Can you be more specific as to the possible COI? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I said it was a possibility, not that it was definite. But at any rate, I sincerely doubt that they have the time or the inclination to go around writing articles about Canadian journalists out of pure unaffiliated altruism — especially since (a) this article was that username's only contribution to Wikipedia to date, and (b) it relied on inside information (i.e. personal knowledge) that didn't have any reliable sourcing to back it up. It may or may not have been COI in the sense of her being directly involved in the organization (although not being on the board doesn't prove that she isn't a member), but I have to presume that the contributor does know her personally in some capacity. Bearcat (talk) 00:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No reliable sources to be found; cannot even back the "award" claim so there is little that we can do to verify this BLP. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.