Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosa Linux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 18:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Rosa Linux

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication of WP:notability. Just another linux distro - based on Mandriva, only references given are to Mandriva and not Rosa Linux. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Very little content as WP: NOTINHERETED states that it doesn't have inhereted notability. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - When I saw this at CAT:PROD I so wish it qualified for CSD given there's nothing more than an infobox. If those sections were filled out, maybe it will be different, but as it stands, there's absolutely no assertion of notability. KTC (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page is mostly an empty shell that the author appears to have abandoned, as it has not been edited in three days. Rotorcowboy $talk contribs$ 08:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is more info in the infobox then the article. This doesn't seem to appear notable and nor does contain anything.  →TSU tp* 10:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.