Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosaen Family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kubigula (talk) 05:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Rosaen Family

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not support the family's notability. ZZArch talk to me 00:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete WP is not the place to post genealogical research. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 02:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as random per WP:NOT. Bearian (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears as if article was started and left as unfinished. After searching on the family surname "Rosaen", I find nothing worth notable to include as an encyclopedic reference.  SaveATreeEatAVegan 22:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.