Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosalind (education)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Bioinformatics. J04n(talk page) 11:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Rosalind (education)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete, does not meet notability standards, 4000 users is the only claim to notability. Sources likewise do not hold up as WP:RS Hell In A Bucket (talk) 08:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 09:06, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Rosalind recognized as Best Educational Resource in the Top Bioinformatics Contributions of 2012. --Vyahhi (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with that publication, is this a blog?Hell In A Bucket (talk) 09:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's bioinformatics blog. Vyahhi (talk) 08:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The BioInform reference is a reliable secondary source The others are not. Mark viking (talk) 12:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

There also exists publication in Russian, but it may be not suitable for English wikipedia: http://www.polit.ru/article/2012/11/17/rosalind/ Vyahhi (talk) 08:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Non-English reliable sources are fine in English Wikipedia. It looks like a reasonable article with enough coverage of Rosalind to be considered in depth, at least in Google translation. I don't know the website; would you consider this organization to be a reliable news source? Mark viking (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 04:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect to Bioinformatics. This is the result of US/Russia academic collaboration and seems well worth a mention in the main article. WP:BEFORE is relevant and I would have expected a explanation as to why a merge was not considered suitable in the nomination statement. TerriersFan (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I rarely think merge is a viable option. I am not opposed when it's brought up but I am a deletionist, I believe with a few exceptions that if it shouldn't be there is not much sense or use in merging it to an overall article it just spams up that other overall article. just my opinion. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is completely notable and useful. 169.228.148.144 (talk) 07:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: 169.228.148.144 is currently blocked, as one of a number of IP sockpuppets used by Rhinotate to try to rig another AfD. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect per User:Hell in a Bucket above. Notable enough for a mention in the Bioinformatics article, but not enough for a stand-alone. GenQuest  "Talk to Me" 07:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.