Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Connors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep
 * Other than the nominator, there were no 'delete's, so consensus is to keep. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Rose Connors

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable author, sources are self-pub bio, bio from a family run fan database, and a possible mention in a larger piece on mystery novels. Not seeing the unique contributions to the field or the award winning work that usually indicates notability.  MBisanz  talk 19:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Simon and Schuster's website is not a fan run self publish bio site. And winner of a notable award. Canterbury Tail   talk  20:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okey, the award indicates notability then.  MBisanz  talk 21:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually I can't find that much of the award. Is it notable? Could change things. Canterbury Tail   talk  12:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Winner of Mary Higgins Clark award is notable.  LotLE × talk  19:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.