Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Creek Lodge, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Rose Creek Lodge, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The name already suggests it isn't a settlement, and there is at least one large building there that could be a lodge or something else entirely. Searching by the name brings up nothing useful except a caption name drop in a book on log cabin construction, and it's not at all clear it's any of the buildings here. I also tried "Rose Creek Ranch" as Google claims there is a short road there by that name, but other than a mess of apparently irrelevant real estate hits (including one in Montana) I got nothing that way. Mangoe (talk) 00:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - while not as much as some of the other recent AfD's, there are sources pointing to this as a populated place, such as this, and this, this. Onel 5969  TT me 01:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Curbon7 (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete The linked National Gazetteer calls it a locale (geography), not a populated place (ppl). It does appear to be a small neighborhood with some homes but I don't see it passing WP:GEOLAND2. Reywas92Talk 13:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)\


 * Delete - No evidence that this place is notable under GEOLAND or GNG, whatever it was. –dlthewave ☎ 15:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:GEOLAND. Passing trivial mentions in newspapers do not meet GEOLAND's "non-trivial coverage by their name in multiple, independent reliable sources". Cxbrx (talk) 16:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Searching finds newspapers references in the 30s/40s calling it a camp or lodge, with "all comforts and conveniences and facilities for outdoor activities such as riding, fishing and hunting in season". Not a populated place. MB 20:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.~ Pog ing  Juan  12:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - simply change the page to the lodge, if you don't think there's enough to show it as a populated place, the lodge clearly has enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 19:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.