Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose George

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep --Aranda56 06:32, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Rose George
There are very few citations or footnotes for this article. It reads like self-promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.76.8.93 (talk) 16:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

VfD not previously listed - no vote --Doc (?) 00:28, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Reads like a vanity page. Exploding Boy 00:13, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP - Perhaps, but she is very notable. One of Britain's biggest journalists (23,000+ hits on Google), who has written for Financial Times (equivalent to Wall Street Journal), Daily Telegraph (biggest broadsheet paper in UK), Independent etc. How many westerners are invited to Saddam Hussein's birthday party??? 62.254.64.14 16:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * This user has been blocked for vandalism. --malathion talk 23:54, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * That wasn't me! As the talk page clearly says, it is a proxy account used by an entire county of people (apparently 500,000+ people). So get your facts right before making such accusations. 62.254.64.14 09:39, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, there's no way of establishing that particular "fact." As I suggested on your talk page, if you want to contribute regularly and be taken seriously, you should create a user name.  Exploding Boy 16:47, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * No biting. At least here nothing this anon is saying shouldn't be "taken seriously." I'm keep and have tidied the page slightly. Marskell 17:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is one of the most well-known writers in the country. Shouldn't be deleted, but needs expanding / cleaning up a lot. MorganStanMan 19:50, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable journalist. Nandesuka 02:03, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but it still reads like a fan gush. Geogre 03:26, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable journalist, but the article needs to be cleaned up. Carioca 01:35, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and delist, obviously notable. &mdash;RaD Man (talk 07:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.