Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Tinted


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted WP:CSD per article author's request on his talk page JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Rose Tinted

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

There is no indication that this new self-published 96-page novella meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books). Contested PROD. JohnCD (talk) 17:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No publisher, no article for the author, no reception, this year, nothing but primary source links.... You know, this is one of those times where I think BEFORE is such a low percentage proposition that I don't think it's a good use of anyone's time. Delete for now; recreate if and when it actually has some notability or independent verifiability. Jclemens (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator for completeness: an article about the author was posted at the same time as this, but I deleted it per WP:CSD, as the only claim of importance was that he has written this book and plans to publish another; that is what led me to this article. By way of BEFORE I did the standard WorldCat check to see how many libraries hold this book, and found that WorldCat doesn't list it. JohnCD (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.