Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosea Kemp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Rosea Kemp

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A search for sources yielded 1 small hit in gnews, and only 1 line mentions in google books. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, United Kingdom,  and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  03:41, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Part of a set of articles on Desert Island Discs castaways (see List of Desert Island Discs episodes (1961–1970)). Featured subject in an entire episode of a national radio programme. Mentioned in several print sources by dint of that appearance and more. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Described as "a trailblazer for women in Australian meteorology" in The Encyclopedia of Australian Science and Innovation. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Science.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the sources noted by, there is an obituary in Bulletin of the Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society: . Jfire (talk) 05:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. The bylined obit in the Bulletin of the Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, as well as the entry in the Encyclopedia of Australian Science and Innovation seem to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV by multiple independent reliable print sources. The radio recordings, on top of these, makes me believe that this article's subject passes WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG, and I see no persuasive reason to delete. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 05:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.