Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemount Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) treelo  radda  00:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Rosemount Middle School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Per WP:SCHOOL: high schools stay, middle schools go. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 19:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Not exactly. First, WP:SCHOOL is an essay, not a policy.  Second, it is a hotly contested essay with no concensus, thus was abandoned.  Third, in most situations like this, you simply redirect to the school district, in this case Independent School District 196.  In my opinion, REDIRECT would be the solution.  I have made the same mistake plenty of times, and have learned....  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 19:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as a Blue Ribbon School with plenty of sources to meet WP:N. TerriersFan (talk) 20:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Right now, I'd say merge to the school district as there's virtually no relevant, sourced information in the article even if the school is, theoretically, notable. If it's expanded and sourced as has been suggested, I have no problem with it being kept (or split out again in the future, if a merge occurs). ~ mazca  t 20:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's been pretty well sourced now - still could use expansion, but there's enough verifiable info. Clearly a Keep. ~ mazca  t 18:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  20:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to the district - no article-worthy info is in the article Clubmarx (talk) 22:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough independent sources to establish notability. Mvjs  Talking  00:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I still believe Blue Ribbon Schools fulfill notability requirements, about the most standard form of notability currently available in the United States. --Jh12 (talk) 00:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep As noted by Jhl2, there's plenty of precedent for Blue Ribbon Schools being considered notable. Nyttend (talk) 03:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this article passes WP:N, so the discussion of school-specific retention criteria is moot. Plentiful reliable sources available for encyclopedic content, as a blue ribbon school.  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 16:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.