Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RosenkreuzStilette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

RosenkreuzStilette

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, self-created game, according to the reference (I had a Japanese speaker look at it for me). roux   13:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact it's Dōjin soft really gives it away. Unless this has coverage from newspapers, magazines, books or websites not related to the creator, it's not gonna be notable. - Mgm|(talk) 15:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. There are a few unreferenced parts (they say that one character is said to be the strongest character of all time, with no reference) and a few redlinks (I hate them things), but the article is alright, quality-wise. I'll upgrade to a keep if someone references or deletes the 'strong-character' claim and deletes the redlinks. TopGearFreak   Talk  18:06, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - the concern isn't the quality (which is not very good; in-universe is the last of the article's issues); the concern is that the game is not notable in any way. // roux   09:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fan made game that has no coverage from reliable third-party sources whatsoever. Google searches shows mostly links back to distributors, download sites, fan sites, and the game's official site.  Hence, the subject totally fails Wikipedia's notability standards.  Jappalang (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not even an assertion of notability, let alone verification. The article has many other issues, but the notability cannot be addressed by simple maintenance. Icemotoboy (talk) 04:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.