Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetrees Trust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Rosetrees Trust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We need independent source. Looks like spam. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 03:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * delete promotional, self-sourced fake article. WP pages are not proxies for the website of charities (or people, or companies, etc) . Jytdog (talk) 04:44, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable spam. SL93 (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete though commendable, the subject does not meet the WP:GNG. Dloh  cierekim  21:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.