Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetta C. Lue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Spinning Spark  19:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Rosetta C. Lue

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Director of an office within Philadelphia city government. This doesn't seem notable enough per our guidelines at WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. Prod removed without addressing this concern. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete As PROD endorser. The notability just isn't there. This is a promotional article for an aspiring politician I guess, but it fails WP:POLITICIAN by far. § FreeRangeFrog 03:31, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete hopelessly promotional article for non-notable civil servant. Since it's gotten this far, let the AfD conclude, but I might have speedy deleted this as G11.  DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment There were enough assertions to notability in the original article version I found during NPP. Most admins would have rejected a CSD. § FreeRangeFrog 20:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, it would have passed speedy A7 for assertions of importance, but G11 is for being entirely promotional.  DGG ( talk ) 18:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.