Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosie Gray


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Rosie Gray

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article serves mainly as a resume for this reporter, and was originally created by a user banned for editing with multiple accounts. Athene cunicularia (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 13:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes the GNG, since her career is one that reliable sources have paid attention to. That a capsule biography of a writer reads a bit like a resume isn't a fatal problem, since after all, both a resume and a biography report a person's accomplishments. (This article is certainly better in that regard than the interminable stream of marginal academic bios created by doing Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V on a CV.) Whatever the original creator did wrong, the article is independently justifiable. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as per XOR&#39;easter and WP policy. Bio subject clearly notable based on references already in article, to which (WP:BEFORE shows) more could be added. HouseOfChange (talk) 19:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep notable journalist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.