Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Brockley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Ross Brockley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of an actor "known" only for his participation in an ad campaign, and thus making no claim of notability that would pass WP:NACTOR. Article has already been nominated for speedy (which is what it really deserves) and then escalated to prod, with the (WP:SPA) creator removing the templates both times without providing a rationale or any improvement to the notability claim. Delete with fire. Bearcat (talk) 00:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: IMDB has nothing except that he has appeared in some things. Given the fact that an IMDB entry shows up for everything above the level of an extra and that anyone with an agent gets a bio over to IMDB long before Wikipedia (we hope), where it will do more good (we hope), it doesn't appear that this man is primarily an actor. (Hope I did the reference/link properly.) At any rate, based on standards used by the celebrity industry in the U.S., he doesn't appear to be engaged in it. Hithladaeus (talk) 13:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete IMDb shows they exist, but not that they're notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. (On a sidenote, in future if you add references to talkpages or AfDs, can you add  to the bottom of your comment. Otherwise all the references collect at the bottom of the page.) Joseph2302 (talk) 13:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have a bit of a historical block about the ref codes, but I have it on my TTD list. (We used to have a single open bracket, URL, pipe, text, close bracket, and the ext. link would display with alt text. ...Not that I'd know how things used to be done, mind you.) Hithladaeus (talk) 14:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.