Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross E. Dunn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination was withdrawn, do other delete comments.  DGG ( talk ) 04:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Ross E. Dunn

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not assert notability using multiple reliable sources. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK Qworty (talk) 04:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hundreds of reliable sources can be found by simply clicking on the search links spoon-fed in the nomination. I've put references to a few of them in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Aww, thanks Phil! Maybe if you'd done it earlier we wouldn't be in this mess. Thanks to Phil's good work, I'm happy to Withdraw. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Phil Bridger (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:AUTHOR #3 and the multiple major-national-newspaper reviews of his books added to the article by Phil Bridger. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment needs more reliable sources for an encyclopedia Someone65 (talk) 20:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is well sourced on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.