Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Walker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Ross Walker

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Ross Walker, exact phrase, along with "amber" has 10 ghits, the top being a self-promotional site, and the rest seem to be various project pages, no outside coverage by reliable sources. There seems to be no evidence of independent press coverage that mentions Ross Walker in the context of AMBER. He is not currently mentioned in the WP article AMBER. This page was created by User:RossCWalker. The speedy delete tag was removed from the article by a newly created single-purpose account. There is no evidence of notability that satisfies WP:BIO Darkspots 05:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- Pete.Hurd 05:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. He is listed on the first external source in the article as being one of 31 authors of this fine software, but that does not make him notable enough. It is also a COI. --Bduke 08:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. This article is a failure of WP:AUTO and WP:COI. Morenooso 12:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.