Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. Proto :: type  11:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Rost
Was nominated for uncontroversial deletion since it is clearly a hoax, and if not it's still crystal balling, but prod was removed anonymously without comment, so listing for AfD. ~ Matticus78 16:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Additional: The same anonymous editor who removed the prod went on to add the same nonsense to Rost (crater). ~ Matticus78 16:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax/Crystal Balling/Possible attack page against boy in the youtube "trailer" (stranger things have happened) --IslaySolomon 16:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above reasons. -- Chet nc contribstalk 17:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. NawlinWiki 17:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, Unless genuine evidence can be found proving this to be a hoax. Moomccow 03:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, Possibly genuine, cannot yet be judged. Teamkeogh 04:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save per above. Nacon kantari  04:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, Like above, could be genuine.Tcarins 04:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, I rekon it's real. Nortelrye 08:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note The above line was added by Topgearisgreat here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, As there is nothing offencive or proof of a hoax. Topgearisgreat 07:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; WP:NOT a crystal ball, but 99.9999% hoax. WP:V would make good reading for the "possibly genuine" crowd; note where the burden of proof lies. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, as it could indeed be genuine. DjibrilCisse 09:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Observation: Guess what? Users DjibrilCisse, Topgearisgreat, Tcarins, Teamkeogh and Moomccow all joined on the 8th of July and have no edits except to the article and its AfD, with the occasional foray into other articles to vandalize them with Rost references. Fancy that! It must be a coincidence!! I'm not sure where the Nortelrye vote came from, since there is no edit by him/her in this AfD history or that user's own edit history - the comment was in fact added by Topgearisgreat. Also Topgearisgreat added "unfairly nominated" to my initial AfD rationale. For the love of all that is sane, someone ban this joker and his sockpuppets of doom. ~ Matticus78 10:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a crystal ball. Inner Earth 14:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. If later turns out to be true/notable, can always re-add.  68.50.203.109 08:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, crystallized hoaxery. Someone do something about User:Topgearisgreat and his sockpuppets. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 12:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save
 * Delete. As per nomination. Catherine breillat 00:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Save, The movie is real and I have seen a preview in the cinemaUser:Fadewolf
 * Delete As hoax. Hoax tag added to page.  --TeaDrinker 04:19, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Confirmed I too thought that the information put up was possibly a hoax, until a number of my work colleauges saw the trailer at the cinema. I researched into the film a little and added what information I could. 220.237.138.91 06:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxes suck. A lot. Danny Lilithborne 11:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.