Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rota Period


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 09:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Rota Period

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page represents original research. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  20:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for original research. No evidence of prior publication in any reliable source. Google Scholar finds nothing relevant. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article appears to be created by same person as created this periodic table, which is both COI and OR.  Lack of any independant sources shows this is not notable. Edward321 (talk) 23:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps it would be an improvement on the periodic table of elements, but Wikipedia is not the place to unveil new ideas in the hopes of achieving notability; it's a reference source that directs one to ideas that have been achieved notability somewhere else first. JohnCD says it best-- there's no evidence of prior publication in any reliable source.  I wish Mr. Rota all the best, and hope that maybe the concept will be noticed by a magazine, a textbook publisher, etc., in which case it can be referred to among the 2.5 million articles on Wikipedia. Mandsford (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per JohnCD, completely inappropriate for this project. Mvjs  Talking  09:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.