Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotary Club of New York at the United Nations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No good sources were found during the discussion Shii (tock) 04:56, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Rotary Club of New York at the United Nations

 * – ( View AfD View log )

While the Rotary Club is notable, I'm not seeing how an individual unit of the Rotarians - even if at the UN - can be considered notable. Somebody help out a bit here? In addition, the article seems fairly promotional, but doesn't get so much that I'm inclined to G11 the article. --  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I am the author of the article and not a Rotarian member. I pledge for an extra article about the Rotary Club at the United Nations since this points out a unique convergence of a private business membership club and an international non-profit institution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utopian Research (talk • contribs)
 * Fair enough, but you need to explain to us why this is notable, with reliable sources, and in a way that it can be verified. If you can fix this, the article can stand. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 05:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Quick addendum: you need to basically add the sources as to why this unit (or whatever you call an individual club) is notable, accordingly. In and of itself, a UN based club may not be notable per our standards.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 05:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, I will do that in the days to come. Please give me some time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utopian Research (talk • contribs)
 * I added some info about the activities and hope the historical relevance becomes more clear. In regards to your statement "In and of itself, a UN based club may not be notable per our standards", I wanted to point out that there are other articles about UN based foundations such as Lucis Trust which have roster level consultative status which are not flagged for deletion. Please let me know your thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utopian Research (talk • contribs)
 * It's not about relevance, it's about notability. What makes them notable?  The links you need were in my first response to you.  Please don't ignore those, because relevance, in this case, does not enter into it.  Why is this notable? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 06:33, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable division of the main organisation. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.