Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roths Industries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Roths Industries

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsourced, seems non-notable, and the article is largely a catalog of the defunct company's tractors. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 19:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Non-promotional page about a defunct commercial manufacturing firm. THIS indicates that it is the subject of specialist historical interest. While unsourced and showing signs of certain weaknesses, these are ultimately editing matters. Carrite (talk) 20:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Carrite. AllyD (talk) 18:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Sorry, I'm not seeing it. The company only existed for 15 years and I can find no evidence it was ever a major player. In addition to the website Carrite linked to, I found one passing mention in a book about the history of garden tractors, plus a poorly subscribed fansite for people who restore or collect these tractors. That's it. Not enough. --MelanieN (talk) 23:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per sources: Sources:, , , , , and - most intriguingly - . I believe there's sufficent information here to satisfy notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:11, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.