Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RotoQL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

RotoQL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The individual Maxdalury is barely notable, I don't think his RotoQL venture passes WP:N; refs have passing mentions. super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 01:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I speedied this as spam, it's still promotional in tone and non-notable as per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best for now as the article is not yet better convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  02:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.