Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rouge (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Rouge (rapper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

there seem not to be enough independent in-depth coverage on the subject to pass WP:GNG. No reliable source could be provided about the peak positions of the songs she released, majority of them being download links. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and Stubify References in WP:RS are passing or very short, but enough to prove existence, profession, and place of birth/background. Just slips over the bar of WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * They are passing mentions which isn't enough to prove notability.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as our policies WP:NOT instead apply given the fact none of this amounts to genuine substance and the nomination shows and concurs this, a fact of WP:GNG perhaps applying is a guideline, not policy, therefore can not be superseded in place of policy. SwisterTwister   talk  00:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.