Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roula Partheniou


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, ZI Jony  (Talk) 14:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Roula Partheniou

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing to suggest that this person passes WP:ARTIST TheLongTone (talk) 12:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I was afraid this was going to happen when I saw the article this morning. The article is terrible and looks like it's been written by the studio intern. I'm pretty sure I can fix it though. Give me a few hours. I haven't got time now. One note about Nothing to suggest that this person passes WP:ARTIST: Criterion #3 states "for example, a book". Such a book exists. I have listed it under the bibliography. The publisher, Black Dog has sadly gone under but was highly regarded as a publisher of artist monographs (among other things). Vexations (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Similarly to Vexations, looking at the section of the CV (which shouldn't be a source at all), under Publications/Press, shows that she likely has signicant coverage from periodicals and exhibition materials. Curiocurio talk) contribs) 21:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment CV source replaced with more independent source.96.127.244.201 (talk) 03:07, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 13:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep also satisfies WP:ARTIST 4(d) for work in permanent collections of UT Art Museum and Musee d'art Contemporaine de Montreal.--Theredproject (talk) 01:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Verification failed on the MAC claim.96.127.244.201 (talk) 02:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep easy to find excellent sources, plus the collection s mentioned above. TheLongTone needs to perform WP:BEFORE, as both this nomination and the one below it are obvious keeps. If I can turn up excellent sources in a few seconds, then WP:BEFORE was not done.96.127.244.201 (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:NARTIST, for reasons given by editors above, this can be closed early as a snowy keep. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Kraose (talk) 06:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


 * WikiProject Women in Red/Article alerts One of the wikiprojects is alerting its members to this AFD. I note that there had been no notification of this on this page. WCM email 11:50, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Alerting editors to AFD discussions in a neutral way is perfectly fine.96.127.244.201 (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not merely fine, it's standard and automated infrastructure used by most WikiProjects. There is nothing unusual about it for this AfD or this project. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Snow keep per WP:NARTIST. gidonb (talk) 19:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. As well as the subject-specific notability, she has multiple stories specifically about her in major newspapers  giving her a pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.