Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Round (Theosophy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__.  Sandstein  18:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Round (Theosophy)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable Theosophy topic that has no reliable independent coverage. No academic historians have covered this topic. The article has not had any reliable sources in over a decade. Most of the content from the article is taken from Arthur E. Powell a Theosophist. I believe a deletion is necessary here per lack of sourcing. This is not a notable topic. Psychologist Guy (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Spirituality.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I did some searching, but this doesn't seem to be covered in depth by any reliable independent sources. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.