Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rouper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Shimeru 04:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Rouper

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has no sources (thereby failing WP:ATT), has no incoming links (suggesting it isn't a topic of encyclopedic value), and is little more than a dictdef with a bit of original research tossed in. Prodded and de-prodded. Picaroon 15:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced neologism. JavaTenor 19:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Thewinchester (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk) 05:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete bollocks. Made up in school one day - Peripitus (Talk) 06:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably is made up. It is not in the full Macquarie Dictionary, the definitive Australian dictionary. --Bduke 08:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Never heard it used, I've heard other nicknames for redheads but this isn't one of them. Orderinchaos 08:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bduke Bandwagonman 10:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete textbook neologism. Lankiveil 13:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.