Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rox De Luca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Rox De Luca

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Regrettably, I'm not seeing evidence that the subject passes WP:GNG/WP:NARTIST. I hope to be proved wrong! IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 10:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Arts, Visual arts, Italy,  and Australia. IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 10:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment, there seem to be enough reputable sources on the page for notability. Will watch this discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment, please let me know what is missing to make notability.louibu (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment, considerable work has been done on this page since the AfD was posted. Can the discussion be closed and the notice removed? Louibu (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm still not seeing evidence that the subject passes WP:NARTIST, so I won't be withdrawing the nomination. In particular, in my reading, the presented sources don't seem enough to constitute significant critical attention, nor is the subject's work represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, which seem the two easiest criteria for the subject to pass. IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 08:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The discussion will run at least seven days. There is no reason present for a speedy close in either direction. Star   Mississippi  13:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, evidence of the subject's work represented within permanent collections of several notable galleries has been added. Carolinephillips (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * What are these notable galleries, and where is the evidence? IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 22:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Your mileage may vary, but to me, these sources, assessed together, do not demonstrate that WP:GNG is met. In particular, we have only one "chunky" piece that focuses on the artist, while the rest are either borderline trivial mentions or the artist and their work are discussed, in no more than a paragraph, as a subtopic. IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 10:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep, the source analysis shows that sufficient sources have been obtained to reach GNG. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep IMO WP:BASIC is marginally met. X (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.