Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanna Bina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Roxanna Bina

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Previously deleted via PROD so no longer eligible. No indication that Bina actually passes WP:NACTOR, WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NJOURNALIST. She does not have multiple significant acting roles nor have any of these books that she has released garnered significant attention. I suppose the other claim to significance is being an 'influencer', but I see this word used way too often on subjects that don't even pass the bare minimum of WP:GNG. I have used a few search engines, including DDG, which filters out a lot of the junk sources, but still not found anything significant. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete article creator does have COI:username “Roxybina” – Cupper 52 Discuss! 12:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I’ve voted already, Bina has less than 800 subs on YT. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 16:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This article makes her out to be some sort of internet superstar but I, too, have found no proof. I also expected her to have more than 1300 followers on Twitter. Barely more than me and I'm a complete nobody! Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete on top of no proof of notability, 800 subs is pitiful for a supposed "influencer". Best, GPL93 (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about her. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 14:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Previous PROD was correct and nothing seems better now. No meaningful sources, no WP:GNG, likely autobiography. No meaningful sources in Google either.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly non-notable in every sense of the word, not to mention pure vanity piece by the subject themselves. There really needs to be a better mechanism for preventing this sort of nonsense going live in the first place. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of anything that would show WP notability in any category and has no significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Papaursa (talk) 23:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.