Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Emiliano Nash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:58, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Roy Emiliano Nash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does meet notability guidelines. Very little in the way of references, and very little turns up in web searches. Onel5969 (talk) 12:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 13.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 13:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 13:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 13:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 13:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. Kierzek (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've been able to add a couple of references, but am unable to independently substantiate the one first prize his firm's website says he won, the Premio Bergamo for urban planning in 2010. The other awards, for which I did find references, are second places. I don't find any independent extended treatments of him or his work that would meet GNG. The article has been gutted a couple of times, but the older versions didn't net any additional references either. So I have not been able to find sufficient evidence of notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.