Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Leep (3nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Roy Leep
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hopefully we can finally get to a confirmed consensus considering the 2 other AfDs (3 if you count the third listed here at the side), my own searches have found nothing at all actually convincing and there's summarily nothing else better. SwisterTwister  talk  07:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, no notability asserted beyond a local scope. Interesting that three previous AFDs were all cut short due to socking. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  20:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete local weather men are almost never notable. This article dates from the early days of Wikipedia when it was being fill up in a haphazard manner in a hobbyist way that ignored any sense of what a coherent encyclopedia that would really be beneficial to people would look like.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.