Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Leep (Second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was CANCELLED due to repeated sockery. -Splash - tk 17:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Roy Leep
Non-notable local Amreican weather presenter. Fails Notability (people). First vote was filled with CFIF sockpuppet nonsense and was undeleted. Lets have a clean vote this time! Lost Knob 08:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong keep notable weather presenter with tons of experience, bad-faith nom by user who trolls. --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 11:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: For same reason that Paul Dellegatto should be kept (namely being far more notable than many of the bios here). —Wknight94 (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: That does not seem like a good "keep" rationale. Your argument could just as easily be used to DELETE "many of the bio's here". Zunaid 15:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note also that the bad faith comments from CFIF stem from the fact that this article has been speedied twice after vandals turned it into an attack page and then tagged with db-attack. Not sure how a couple weathermen have drawn so much hatred but there is clearly a nasty campaign going on.  —Wknight94 (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete' Non-notable weatherman on a (local?) TV station who fails the professor test. There is NOTHING substantial in the article to indicate notability. (On a broader question: Is there a notability guideline for TV personalities? Do they get articles just for doing their job?) Zunaid 15:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Let's be fair with that criteria - George W. Bush is just doing his job too. So is Jack Nicholson, etc.  Sorry but when your "job" happens to be going on TV in front of potentially 2 or 3 million people, that's a lot more notable than 95% of the professors here. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with WTVT news team. Reborox 15:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.