Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Murphy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Roy Murphy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability from third-party sources William Avery (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete -- notability not demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. Appears to be a fluffed up bio from mostly primary sources, which most of the article's claims totally unsourced. N2e (talk) 21:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete ditto to previous statement. —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 07:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - a specific search of the most astounding claim reveals no Ghits. A search with the usual false Ghits removed finds 7 Ghits. I found nothing on Google scholar, nor at Google news.  A random request to one of my IT colleagues results in a blank stare and "I've never heard of him...."  The subject appears to have some cites, but nothing that reaches the level of WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Bearian (talk) 22:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.