Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Sloan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Roy Sloan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As far as I can confirm, this author has written a book--and that's all I can find. I gladly stand corrected, but considering his (claimed) position and publication record it seems to me WP:PROF is not met, and WP:GNG certainly is not. Drmies (talk) 20:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any RS that would fulfill WP:AUTHOR or WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 18:14, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. One published academic review of one of his books (all I could find) is not enough for WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also, there are no real citations to speak of to his work, nor is his position as head of a secondary school notable per se. Uncontroversial policy-based delete. Agricola44 (talk) 05:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.