Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy olcott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per improvements since nomination and consensus. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 21:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Roy olcott

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged for speedy but notability is asserted. Unencyclopaedic tone, no references. Guy (Help!) 10:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - seems notable, though agreed the article is full of POV and unencyclopedic tone, but as I understand it, those are grounds for tagging and improvement, rather than deletion. --Dweller 12:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've dealt with some of the worst excesses. --Dweller 12:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep if multiple independent sources can be found (not including horse racing publications). Otherwise delete since the subject might be of too little interest.  Saligron 13:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep if the author references the article --Abu-Bakr69 13:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The horse meets notability requirements.  Philippe Beaudette 16:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve if notability is confirmed, but move to the proper capitalization. Krimpet 03:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.