Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  00:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Royal Plaza Hotel (Hong Kong)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

post-PROD, did a valiant effort to expand this, but the evidence found does not establish notability. A wedding planner said it would be a good wedding venue and highlighted some features, and sewers nearby had some issues. It exists, but appears to be your typical high end hotel. StarM 00:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.       StarM 00:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.       StarM 00:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.       StarM 00:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
 * The book profiles Royal Plaza Hotel on pages 127–131. The book notes that the hotel was recommended by the Michelin Guide's "Michelin Guide Hong Kong Macau" as a "high-grade cozy" hotel five consecutive times between 2009 and 2013. The book notes that the hotel received Wedding Magazine's "best venue (hotel) for star wedding banquet" listing for five consecutive years. Wedding planner Tim Lau said Royal Plaza Hotel would be a good choice for a wedding venue. He observed that the staff were very attentive, the venue offered different food options for Chinese-style and Western-style weddings, and it was conveniently located near the MTR station Mong Kok East station.
 * The book profiles the Royal Plaza Hotel.
 * This is a 105-word review of the Hong Kong hotel from an Indian newspaper, making it an international source. The Times of India is an Indian newspaper of record.
 * There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Royal Plaza Hotel to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 01:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. I found two sources related to events happened at the hotel:
 * -- Sun8908 &#8239;Talk 02:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG per the sources provided by Cunard. Best, VocalIndia (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * -- Sun8908 &#8239;Talk 02:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG per the sources provided by Cunard. Best, VocalIndia (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.