Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Tit-Watching (Ornithological) Society of Britain

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 20:00, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

Royal Tit-Watching (Ornithological) Society of Britain
Piss-take masquerading as factual content - SP-KP 21:40, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Preferably keep. At the very least merge the information to Titmouse . Samaritan 21:56, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * A royal society should be notable enough. Samaritan 21:58, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I think you're missing the point here - this society isn't real.... - SP-KP 21:59, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Take a closer look at the external link. Either you're missing the joke, or there are some really goofy Brits that really like Titmice. (Titmouses?) android&harr;talk 22:01, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * No, I do get the joke. My nomination is based on the premise that Wikipedia should contain entries about real things, containing factual information. I'm still a relative newcomer though, so tell me if that's not what WP is about. - SP-KP 22:04, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * That response was directed at Samaritan. android&harr;talk 22:12, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry, I realised that after I hit "Save page" -SP-KP 22:15, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Samaritan 22:52, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Is an article that references an already-existing joke site BJAODN-worthy? If not, Delete. I got a laugh out of it, though. android&harr;talk 22:01, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, or merge to Titmouse and/or BJAODN. The best thing about the article is the link to the external site, which is already at the end of the Titmouse article. -- Mwanner 23:26, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not serious enough for a merge to Titmouse and not funny enough for BJAODN. --Angr/comhrá 10:19, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, a nice try, quite entertaining, but not really worthy of any lasting memorial. Definitely not to merge with Titmouse. Naturenet 17:04, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.