Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal University for Women (Riffa)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 12:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Royal University for Women (Riffa)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article does not meet notability guidelines, and does not contain sources. Tinton5 (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


 * This appears to be a duplicate listing for the Royal University for Women. School is clearly notable, but I don't see anything in the current listing that needs to be merged to the existing article, so perhaps speedy delete under CSD A10 would be appropriate, or a redirect if it's thought that this is a likely variant title.--Arxiloxos (talk) 00:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Per A10, Arxiloxos has it right. I think redirect is not necessary for this title, but "Ruw", which currently redirects here (and was the original name of the article before being renamed by someone else), should probably be repointed to Royal University for Women. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 16:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Per A10. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.