Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Wins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Royal Wins

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article on a gaming company that can't even spell the name of the company consistently. (Royal Win? Royal Wins?) Has two refs: a dead link that isn't RS coverage anyway and the company's YT channel. I looked for RS coverage but could only find six regurgitations of PR releases-- nothing significant or independent. Fails WP:GNG. Blue Edits (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, bit of a side note but the article began life in 2013 as "MojiKan", an unsourced stub about a "3D Virtual Social Game World", then turned into "MORF Dynamics", the name of the studio that created it, and then turned into "Royal Wins", all by the same SPA. Blue Edits (talk) 18:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Philippines,  and Costa Rica. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy G11 as obvious, though somewhat subtle, promotion. dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: as WP:G11 SeanJ 2007 (talk) 04:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's findings -- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:49, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete -- not notable, agree with nom --Filmmaniac Tomik (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)  —  is a suspected sock puppet of.
 * Delete. This could be a WP:G11, but I'm also completely unconvinced that there is significant coverage of this company by multiple independent reliable secondary sources, so regular deletion also works. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:37, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Speedy or not, the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP outright. - Aoidh (talk) 22:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.