Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royalty Check


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Royalty Check

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Article containing hypothetical information and rumors about an album to be released at some unspecified point in the future. Not currently notable. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 00:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 03:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: No information, WP:CRYSTAL --Fbifriday (talk) 05:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL. Warrah (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. This is the best I can find as far as "significant coverage", and I don't believe there's enough information to support an independent article, not to mention a lack of a release date or track listing. This does not appear to meet WP:NALBUMS.  Gongshow  Talk 00:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 02:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per comments above by gongshow, Glenfarclas etc --Brunk500 (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL says it all really DRosin (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.